Arrington v. Trammell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding “whether there was any evidence to authorize a finding by the jury that the conduct of the defendant amounted to wantonness,” which was “the sole issue” on appeal, and defining the phrase 22 “reckless (wanton) misconduct” (emphasis supplied)
• noting that there were Georgia cases holding that wantonness could not be established absent “proof that the misconduct is reckless in the degree that the jury would be 26 justified to find it equivalent in spirit to actual intent” (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).