Arrington v. . Screws

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that accomplice could be prosecuted in county X, where principal committed charged offense, although accomplice’s acts occurred only in county Y: under agency theory, principal’s acts in county X were deemed to be acts of accomplice in county X
• holding that accomplice could be prosecuted in county X, where principal committed charged offense, although accomplice’s acts occurred only in county Y: under agency theory, principal’s acts in county X were deemed to be acts of accomplice in county X

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).