Arrington v. Mattox Ex Rel. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that the \easement migrates and moves ... with the natural movements of the natural line of vegetation and the line of mean low tide\
• affirming that the “easement migrates and moves ... with the natural movements of the natural line of vegetation and the line of mean low tide”
• affirming that the \easement migrates and moves . . . with the natural movements of the natural line of vegetation and the line of mean low tide\
• affirming that the “easement migrates and moves . . . with the natural movements of the natural line of vegetation and the line of mean low tide”
• recognizing the distinction between a governmental taking of an easement through an act of sovereignty and judicial recognition of a common law easement acquired through historical public use and holding that the latter did not amount to a \taking\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).