Arrington v. Grant Parish School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting ineffectiveness claim where the Commonwealth introduced testimony by police detective referencing defendant’s silence “for the narrow purpose of describing the extent and focus of his investigation, not as substantive evidence of guilt”
• where police 2 Because the interaction constituted a mere encounter, Linnen was not entitled to receive Miranda warnings. See Commonwealth v. Garvin, 50 A.3d 694, 698 (Pa. Super. 2012
• “[e]xamples of circumstances that might indicate a seizure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).