Skip to main content

Arrington v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 87 Va. 96
  • 10 L.R.A. 242
  • 12 S.E. 224
  • 1890 Va. LEXIS 97

Syllabus

<p>1. Sale op Liquors—Indictment—Place—Time—Sample.—Indictment under ’ Acts 1889-90, p. 242, sec. 1, for selling liquor without license, must definitely state the place where sold, but the exact time of the sale need not be stated, nor need it be stated that the sale was “ by sample, representation, or otherwise.”</p> <p>2. Former Jeopardy.—Prosecution for selling liquor on Sunday contrary to Code, sec. 3804, is no bar to prosecution for selling same liquor without license contrary to Acts 1889-’90, p. 242, sec. 1.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the court held that an indictment alleging that the defendant illegally sold liquor “on a certain day, between the 13th day of September, 1889, and the 12th day of September, 1890” was sufficient to inform the defendant of the time of his offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.