Skip to main content
· 11/3/2008

Arriaga v. CitiCapital Commercial Corp.

Citations

  • 167 Cal. App. 4th 1527
  • 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 143
  • 67 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 118
  • 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing California' adopted the UCC and discussing definition of finance lease in section 10103
  • recognizing California adopted the UCC and discussing definition of finance lease in section 10103
  • noting that “[b]eyond P Pp manufacturers, . . . retailers engaged in the business of distributing goods to the public are strictly liable in tort for personal injuries caused by defects in those goods,” which “works no injustice” because (1
  • finding no duty to inspect and no negligence where defendant was a “passive” “finance lessor” that “had neither the opportunity nor the expertise to inspect the machine in order to discover defects”
  • declining to extend strict liability under 19 stream of commerce theory to defendant finance lessor and seller of glue spreading machine, who 20 never came into contact with product but only executed the financial lease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.