Skip to main content
· 8/14/2009

Arreola v. Administrative Concepts

Citations

  • 17 So. 3d 792
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11323
  • 2009 WL 2475151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In deciding this issue, the JCC had to answer two questions. The first is whether Claimant made or caused to be made false, fraudulent or misleading statements. The second is whether the statement was intended by Claimant to be for the purpose of obtaining benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkes, Lewis, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.