Arrellano v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statement made during a personal hearing, when later reduced to writing in a transcript, constitutes a Notice of Disagreement within the meaning of 38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)
• holding that statement by appellant’s representative at RO hearing when later reduced to writing functioned as, and met statutory definition of, NOD because it triggered issuance of SSOC and led to appellate review by BVA
• Court construed 38 C.F.R. § 20.201 as imposing no technical formal requirements for a Notice of Disagreement beyond the requirements set by 38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)(2)
• transcribed statement of accredited representative “undoubtedly functioned as an NOD”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).