Arreguin v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “although the purposes of Act 250 are broad, its application is not without limitation”
• rejecting argument that jointly owned parcel was separate and distinct from individually owned parcel for jurisdictional purposes
• legislative ratification of agency's interpretation of own authority must be enforced by courts
• legislative ratification of agency’s interpretation of own authority must be enforced by courts
• under Act 250, automatic issuance of permit in one part of statute and absence of same provision in another part of the statute shows that Legislature did not intend automatic issuance in the latter
• “[T]he fact that § 6085(d) allows for automatic issuance of a permit under certain circumstances illustrates that the Legislature knew how to provide for a remedy if it chose to. The absence of a similar express provision in § 6086(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).