Arredondo v. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a respondent to “point[] out to the trial court where in the documents the issues set forth in the motion or response are raised”
• requiring a respondent to “point[ ] out to the trial court where in the documents the issues set forth in the motion or response are raised”
• ―[T]he trial court is [not] required to wade through a voluminous record to marshal [a party’s] proof.‖
• “Because [nonmovants’] response did not direct the trial court to any specific portion of their summary judgment evidence, [non-movants] failed to raise a fact issue sufficient to defeat [movant’s] no-evidence motion for summary judgment.”
• “Because plaintiffs’ response did not direct the trial court to any specific portion of their summary judgment evidence, plaintiffs failed to raise a fact issue sufficient to defeat appellee’s no-evidence -5- 04-19-00408-CV motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).