Arras v. Herrin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county vio lated due process in denying liquor license when applicant met all the ordinance’s objective standards for location
• county ordinance setting forth Board of Commissioners’ absolute discretion to grant beer and wine license was unconstitutional because it was not “tempered with ascertainable standards”
• county ordinance was unconstitutionally vague where it gave Board of Commissioners absolute discretion to grant beer and wine license without ascertainable standards
• county ordinance was unconstitutionally vague where it gave Board of Commissioners absolute discretion to grant beer and wine license without ascertainable standards
• county ordinance setting forth Board of Commissioners’ absolute discretion to grant beer and wine license was unconstitutional because it was not “tempered with ascertainable standards”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).