Skip to main content
· 3/1/2012

Arrañaga v. United States

Citations

  • 103 Fed. Cl. 465
  • 2012 WL 666561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding for development of a record and correction of errors
  • strict compliance with R.C. 4903.09 is not required, but the commission abuses its discretion if it renders an opinion on an issue without record support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Block

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.