Arraby Properties, LLC v. Paul Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutory text, which omitted rule imputed to statute in legislative committee report, was the “authoritative expression of the law”
• holding that Section 20(b) did not have a control element
• noting that RCRA “empowers EPA to regulate hazardous wastes from cradle to grave.... ”
• stating that “Congress knew how to draft a waste stream exemption in RCRA when it wanted to” and “reject[ing] the Solicitor General’s plea for deference to the EPA’s interpretation, which goes beyond the scope of whatever ambiguity [the statute] contains”
• using textual and structural analysis to reject agency's view as \beyond the scope of whatever ambiguity\ existed in statute
• noting that RCRA implementing regulations come from the EPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).