Skip to main content
· 4/30/2012

Arpaio v. Figueroa

Citations

  • 276 P.3d 513
  • 229 Ariz. 444
  • 633 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 35
  • 2012 WL 1511735
  • 2012 Ariz. App. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that special action jurisdiction is appropriate “when the subject of the discovery order is ‘privileged or confidential material . . . .’”
  • explaining basis for limits on financial discovery when claim for punitive damages asserted
  • special action jurisdiction is “particularly appropriate” when the discovery order applies to privileged or confidential information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vásquez, Kelly, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.