Aroostook Valley Railroad v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the contractual language “the parties may negotiate new or other clauses” was precatory and should be construed as “permissive and discretionary, not mandatory” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).