Aronov v. Sec. of Rev.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that although “[t]he word ‘may’ is prima facie permissive, importing discretion, . . . courts construe it to be mandatory when it is necessary to accomplish the manifest purpose of the Legislature”
• The word “may” is prima facie permissive, importing discretion, and is not to be construed to be mandatory unless necessary to accomplish the manifest purpose of the legislature.
• evidence showed crossing was used daily by the general public for at least forty years
• “The word ‘may’ is prima facie permissive, importing discretion.”
• “The word ‘may’ is prima facie permissive, importing discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).