Aronoff v. PAJ Ents., Inc.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1759
Syllabus
Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss fraud civil conspiracy negligence motion to compel sanctions. - Trial court did not err in granting defendant's Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss where on the basis of the law and facts alleged plaintiff could prove no set of facts that would entitle him to relief on his claims for fraud, civil conspiracy, and negligence defendant was not required to answer the complaint within 28 days because it filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff never filed a motion to compel discovery and, thus, there was no error in the trial court's failure to impose sanctions on the defendant for not responding to plaintiff's discovery requests.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[The minor] objected . . . that failure to turn in paperwork did not meet the criteria for detention. The criteria for detention under Section 32A–2–11, however, is applicable before disposition; [the minor] was already on probation.” (emphasis added)
- “[The minor] objected . . . that failure to turn in paperwork did not meet the criteria for detention. The criteria for detention under Section 32A–2–11, however, is applicable before disposition; [the minor] was already on probation.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.