Aromant Usa, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding \preparations there for \ is a \principal use provision\ because it identified preparations primarily used for soups and broths
• listing appropriate considerations for use provisions, such as \use in the same manner as merchandise which defines the class\ and \the manner in which the merchandise is advertised and displayed\
• \[A]ctual use of the particular imported goods is evidence of the principal use of the merchandise involved.\
• “[T]his heading is an eo nomine provision, that is, a provision that describes an article by a specific name, not by use.”
• “The soups and broths portion of this heading is an eo nomine provision, that is, a provision that describes an article by a specific name, not by use.”
• “Principal use provisions are governed by ARI 1(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).