Skip to main content
· 1/7/1924

Arnold v. United States Ex Rel. W. B. Guimarin & Co.

Citations

  • 263 U.S. 427
  • 44 S. Ct. 144
  • 68 L. Ed. 371
  • 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2826

Syllabus

<p>A judgment of the Circuit Court' of Appeals, in an action on a contractor’s bond brought by -a creditor under the Federal Material-men’s Act, which affirms the District Court in holding the action hot premature and in adjudicating the amount due the plaintiff, but remands the case for jury trial of the claims of intervening creditors, and settles neither the amount of the claims to be allowed against the bond nor the proportionate share of each creditor if ■ the bond prove inadequate to pay all, does not finally and completely dispose of the subject matter of the litigation, either as to the parties or the causes of action involved, and cannot be brought here by writ of error. P. 432.</p>

Judges: Sanford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.