· 11/10/1997
Arnold v. Tennessee Board of Paroles
Citations
- 956 S.W.2d 478
- 1997 Tenn. LEXIS 533
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Board also considered the number of victims and the risk to re-offend
- where treatment program is religious and is the only treatment program available, forced participation and consideration of attendance or nonattendance in parole decisions violates Establishment Clause
- where treatment program is religious and is the only treatment program available, forced participation and consideration of attendance or non-attendance in parole decisions violates Establishment Clause
- AA/NA imposition unconstitutional as a parole condi- tion
- AA/NA imposition unconstitutional as a parole condi- tion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Anderson, Drowota, Reid, Holder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.