Skip to main content
· 11/10/1997

Arnold v. Tennessee Board of Paroles

Citations

  • 956 S.W.2d 478
  • 1997 Tenn. LEXIS 533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Board also considered the number of victims and the risk to re-offend
  • where treatment program is religious and is the only treatment program available, forced participation and consideration of attendance or nonattendance in parole decisions violates Establishment Clause
  • where treatment program is religious and is the only treatment program available, forced participation and consideration of attendance or non-attendance in parole decisions violates Establishment Clause
  • AA/NA imposition unconstitutional as a parole condi- tion
  • AA/NA imposition unconstitutional as a parole condi- tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Anderson, Drowota, Reid, Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.