Skip to main content
· 12/6/1991

Arnold v. S.J.L. of Kansas Corp.

Citations

  • 822 P.2d 64
  • 249 Kan. 746
  • 1991 Kan. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the meaning of a written agreement should always be ascertained by a consideration of all pertinent provisions and not by the critical analysis of a single or isolated provision
  • holding that the meaning of a written agreement should always be ascertained by a consideration of all pertinent provisions and not by the critical analysis of a single or isolated provision
  • holding that in a breach of employment contract case, the statute of limitations began to run when it became apparent that plaintiffs employer was not going to honor the employment agreement
  • holding that demand made after limitations period was unreasonable as to time
  • jury ordinarily determines what is a reasonable time
  • considering all pertinent provisions of a written instrument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.