· 12/6/1991
Arnold v. S.J.L. of Kansas Corp.
Citations
- 822 P.2d 64
- 249 Kan. 746
- 1991 Kan. LEXIS 195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the meaning of a written agreement should always be ascertained by a consideration of all pertinent provisions and not by the critical analysis of a single or isolated provision
- holding that the meaning of a written agreement should always be ascertained by a consideration of all pertinent provisions and not by the critical analysis of a single or isolated provision
- holding that in a breach of employment contract case, the statute of limitations began to run when it became apparent that plaintiffs employer was not going to honor the employment agreement
- holding that demand made after limitations period was unreasonable as to time
- jury ordinarily determines what is a reasonable time
- considering all pertinent provisions of a written instrument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.