Arnold v. Sendak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Attorney General was a proper defendant in a suit challenging a statute that made \abortion ... a criminal act\ because of his \broad powers in the enforcement of the criminal laws of the state\
• holding that the Attorney General was a proper defendant in a suit challenging a statute that made “abortion … a criminal act” because of his “broad powers in the enforce‐ ment of the criminal laws of the state”
• abortion-neutral regulation of clinic licensing
• abortion-neutral regulation of clinic licensing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).