California Court of Appeal· 9/3/1970
Arnold v. Newhall County Water District
Citations
- 11 Cal. App. 3d 794
- 96 Cal. Rptr. 894
- 1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when jurisdiction is obtained by constructive notice, there must be strict compliance with the mode of service prescribed by statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. NixenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-05-21· cited 66×
- Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-03-23· cited 52×
- Evartt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-02-26· cited 46×
- People v. SwinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-03-21· cited 34×
- Katz v. Campbell Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-11-14· cited 31×
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-07-28· cited 31×
- County of Riverside v. Superior Court of Riverside Cty.California Court of Appeal· 1997-04-21· cited 15×
- Phillips v. SeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-11-15· cited 13×
- Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-01-22· cited 10×
- Del Paso Recreation & Park District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-07-18· cited 7×
- Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control v. City of IndioCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-08-09· cited 5×
- Bonander v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-31
- Santa Clarita Org. for Planning etc. v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-08-16
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-27· cited 126×
- City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-04-02· cited 85×
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Kings County Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-10-11· cited 38×
- Helvey v. SaxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-11-13· cited 30×
- Cmty. Redevelopment Agency of L.A. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal· 1967-01-27· cited 20×
- Pinon v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-05-07· cited 20×
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. All Parties and PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-04-29· cited 19×
- Eagle Electric Mfg. Co. v. KeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-12-15· cited 16×
- Harvey v. City of HoltvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-04-14· cited 15×
- In Re FarrantCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-05-24· cited 12×
- Thomson v. Talbert Drainage DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-03-13· cited 10×
- King v. KaplanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-11-18· cited 8×
- California Viking Sprinkler Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 1963-03-13· cited 8×
- Sibbet v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-10-28· cited 6×
- DeLoreto v. Goleta County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-05-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.