Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fifth Circuit· 12/28/2001

Arnold v. Garlock, Inc.

Citations

  • 278 F.3d 426
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1204
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[c]ertainty or even likelihood of such an effect is not a requirement...”
  • holding that “[c]ertainty or even likelihood of such an effect is not a requirement...”
  • “Section 362 is rarely, however, a valid basis on which to stay actions against non-debtors.”
  • “[O]nce a matter related to a bankruptcy case is equitably remanded, it is not subject to federal appellate review on any basis.”
  • “Even if [defendant] had filed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs in each such case, . . . the district court would have been within its discretion to dismiss by order of the court under Rule 41(a)(2).”
  • generally approving of \related to\ jurisdiction for contribution claims in the mass tort context, but declining to enter stay of the remand of third-party actions where the removing defendant had not shown a likelihood of success on any contribution claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Demoss, Parker, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Arnold v. Garlock, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.