Fifth Circuit· 10/2/2002
Arnold v. Cockrell
Citations
- 306 F.3d 277
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20739
- 2002 WL 31060271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because petitioner 1 was not eligible for release on mandatory supervision based on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision in Ex parte Franks, petitioner did “not have a constitutional claim for which relief can be granted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Smith, Clement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Felix Rocha v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2010-11-17· cited 53×
- Mi Familia Vota v. OggFifth Circuit· 2024-06-20· cited 20×
- Covarrubias v. WallaceE.D. Texas· 2012-11-06· cited 2×
- Batiste v. QuartermanS.D. Texas· 2008-07-31· cited 1×
- Anthony Bonfanti, Jr. v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Divisions, Texas Board of Pardons and ParolesTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-08-16
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Arnold v. Cockrell
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.