Arnold v. City of Seminole, Okl.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress and introduced psychiatric testimony on her inability to return to work
• “Back pay need not be proved to an exact, mathematical certainty. The wrongdoer bears the risk of the uncertainty it has created.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).