Arnold Fireworks Display, Inc. v. Schmidt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the amended version of Rule 55 was not “intend[ed] to render meaningless the requirement that an answer must be filed within a set time.”
• stating that the amended version of Rule 55 was not \intend[ed] to render meaningless the requirement that an answer must be filed within a set time.\
• summarily affirming trial court’s refusal to set aside a default judgment where defendants “did not offer any meaningful evidence of mistake or inadvertence” and the record did not “give any reason for the failure to file timely answers”
• summarily affirming trial court's refusal to set aside a default judgment where defendants \did not offer any meaningful evidence of mistake or inadvertence\ and the record did not \give any reason for the failure to file timely answers\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).