Arnold Dresden v. Norman A. Willock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The fact that Dresden was to be paid by receiving stock in the enterprise did not change the nature of the (attorney-client) relationship\
• “The fact that Dresden was to be paid by receiving stock in the enterprise did not change the nature of the [attorney-client] relationship”
• burden of proof as to the propriety of expenditures on a principal’s behalf lies with the agent
• co-owners of business may be fiduciaries in some circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).