Skip to main content
· 2/17/1998

Arnold Champagne v. United States

Citations

  • 136 F.3d 1300
  • 40 Fed. Cl. 1300
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2170
  • 1998 WL 61008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen the meaning of military regulations and instructions are at issue, the armed service’s own interpretation must be given controlling weight UNITED STATES V. DREYER 41 and deference, especially when it has been consistently interpreted over a long period of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Newman, Michel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.