Arnold B. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDWARD APFFELS COFFEE COMPANY, Bill Berry and J.C. Hill, Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is enough, for purposes of the fourth 20 McDonnell Douglas requirement, that the position remained open after the qualified 21 candidate applied for the job, and that someone else was ultimately selected.”
• hiring inexperienced applicants raised factual question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).