Arnita SMITH, Appellant, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the testimony of a non- examining physician can constitute substantial evidence when it is consistent with the record
• stating that the opinion of a non-examining physician can be relied upon as substantial evidence when it is consistent with the record
• observing that the opinions of non-examining physicians can constitute substantial evidence to support the decision of the Commissioner
• finding that the testimony of a non-examining physician can constitute substantial evidence when it is consistent with the record
• finding that the testimony of a non-examining physician can constitute substantial evidence when it is consistent with the record
• stating that the opinion of a non-examining physician can be relied upon as substantial evidence when it is consistent with the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).