Skip to main content

Arnett v. State

Citations

  • 551 So. 2d 1158
  • 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the fact that [the defendant] waited over one year to assert his [speedy-trial] rights weigh[ed] heavily against him\
  • quoting, Barker v. Wingo , 407 U.S. 514 , 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)
  • 20-month delay from indictment to trial was not presumptively prejudicial
  • 15-month delay not presumptively prejudicial
  • 20-month delay not presumptively prejudicial
  • 20-month delay not presumptively prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tyson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.