California Court of Appeal· 2/11/1971
Arnett v. Peterson
Citations
- 15 Cal. App. 3d 170
- 92 Cal. Rptr. 913
- 1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming lower court holding that personal property was not subject to lien created by a recorded abstract of judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Independent Housing Services v. Fillmore Center AssociatesN.D. California· 1993-12-28· cited 75×
- In the Matter of Sylvin S. Perry, Bankrupt. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Curtis B. Danning, Trustee-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1974-03-18· cited 12×
- Imagine Fulfillment Services, LLC v. DC Media Capital, LLC (In re Imagine Fulfillment Services, LLC)C.D. California· 2013-03-12· cited 11×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-04-02· cited 175×
- Heckes v. SappCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-09-08· cited 28×
- Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1953-03-09· cited 20×
- Parker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-07-03· cited 18×
- Design Associates, Inc. v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-01-20· cited 10×
Other cases named Arnett v. Peterson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.