Skip to main content
· 3/29/1994

Arnett v. Aspin

Citations

  • 846 F. Supp. 1234
  • 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 966
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3973
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing sex-plus-age claim under Title VII
  • recognizing sex-plus-age claim under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lowell E. Reed, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.