Arnesen v. Anchorage Refuse, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying purpose of reemployment benefits as \ensur[ing] that an injured employee has some skills with which ... she can earn a living after an injury\
• applying de novo review to interpretation of word \job\ in former AS 23.30.041 and reasonable basis review to tax dependency determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2009-01-29· cited 29×
• Wilson v. State, Department of Corrections
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 15×
• Vandenberg v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-04-08· cited 15×
• Shawn Murphy v. Fairbanks North Star Borough
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2021-09-03· cited 10×
• Lawson v. Lawson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-03-11· cited 9×
• Unisea, Inc. v. De Lopez
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2019-02-08· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-12-04· cited 218×
• Coghill v. Coghill
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 48×
• Keane v. Local Boundary Commission
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-04-14· cited 34×
• Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-04-30· cited 29×
• Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. Coffey
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-04-14· cited 23×
• Morrison v. Afognak Logging, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-02-17· cited 13×
• Pioneer Construction v. Conlon
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-09-29· cited 8×
• Moesh v. Anchorage Sand & Gravel
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1994-07-08· cited 2×