Skip to main content
· 7/1/1879

Armsworthy v. Missouri River, Ft. S. & G. R.

Citations

  • 1 F. Cas. 1161
  • 5 Dill. 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to permit “clever pleading” to transform the nature of a tort claim and recognizing that “[n]early any assault and battery can be pled as a claim for negligence”
  • “The acts of subduing and handcuffing are undoubtedly offensive to a reasonable sense of personal dignity.”
  • officer who subdued and handcuffed the plaintiff committed intentional acts which, unless privileged, constituted a battery
  • officer who subdued and handcuffed the plaintiff committed intentional acts which, unless privileged, constituted a battery
  • “A person is subject to liability for battery when he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact, and when a harmful contact results.”
  • \[a] person is subject to liability for battery when he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillon, Foster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.