· 7/1/1879
Armsworthy v. Missouri River, Ft. S. & G. R.
Citations
- 1 F. Cas. 1161
- 5 Dill. 491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to permit “clever pleading” to transform the nature of a tort claim and recognizing that “[n]early any assault and battery can be pled as a claim for negligence”
- “The acts of subduing and handcuffing are undoubtedly offensive to a reasonable sense of personal dignity.”
- officer who subdued and handcuffed the plaintiff committed intentional acts which, unless privileged, constituted a battery
- officer who subdued and handcuffed the plaintiff committed intentional acts which, unless privileged, constituted a battery
- “A person is subject to liability for battery when he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact, and when a harmful contact results.”
- \[a] person is subject to liability for battery when he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dillon, Foster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.