Skip to main content
· 3/29/1985

Armstrong v. Vedaa (In Re Vedaa)

Citations

  • 49 B.R. 409
  • 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting in the context of the Bank- ruptcy Code that “it is clear that courts favor a return of the property itself if at all possible so as to avoid speculation over its value”
  • “The recovery to be allowed is wholly within the discretion of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William A. Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.