· 3/29/1985
Armstrong v. Vedaa (In Re Vedaa)
Citations
- 49 B.R. 409
- 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting in the context of the Bank- ruptcy Code that “it is clear that courts favor a return of the property itself if at all possible so as to avoid speculation over its value”
- “The recovery to be allowed is wholly within the discretion of the court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William A. Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.