Armstrong v. Vance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that IDEA fee litigation is more like a de novo civil action than a review of an administrative agency decision
• stating that “in light of the plain language of the prospective provision of Section 140 (2002), defendants cannot pay — and will never be required to pay — [above-cap fees]”
• action for IDEA attorney’s fees is akin to a “de novo civil action under the IDEA” and is “wholly different” from an appeal of a hearing officer decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).