Skip to main content
· 3/13/1907

Armstrong v. Van DeNeste

Citations

  • 132 Ill. App. 601
  • 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where plaintiff paid tariff as importer of record, although the goods actually were for the defendant, plaintiff was “not entitled to subrogation because it has not shown that in paying the duties it paid a debt for which the defendant was primarily liable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.