Armstrong v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “officer was not required under [the] circumstances to ask what [the defendant] wanted done with the car prior to impounding it”
• impoundment of defendant’s vehicle following a traffic stop was reasonably necessary where vehicle’s registration had been cancelled, driver and sole passenger were under arrested, and the owner of private property where car was parked did not want the car to remain on the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• STROUD v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-03-01· cited 10×
• State v. Paynter
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-09-28· cited 3×
• State v. Robert Loechinger
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-12-14
• Daniel Manuel Huertas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-02-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• United States v. Lopez
  Second Circuit· 2008-11-10· cited 49×
• Reyes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-28· cited 17×
• Grizzle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-06· cited 15×
• Stringer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-05-30· cited 12×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-22· cited 12×