Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 233 S.W.3d 627
  • 366 Ark. 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no reversible error where the prosecution directed the jury to recall the defendant's reaction to photographic evidence, but acknowledging that the prosecution was limited to evidence in the record and that a defendant's face and body are physical evidence
  • finding no 15 reversible error where the prosecution directed the jury to recall the defendant’s 16 reaction to photographic evidence, but acknowledging that the prosecution was 17 limited to evidence in the record and that a defendant’s face and body are physical 18 evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.