Skip to main content
· 12/15/1988

Armstrong v. Safeco Insurance

Citations

  • 765 P.2d 276
  • 111 Wash. 2d 784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ambiguity is not found \solely upon each party's ability to argue a distinct interpretation of the statute\
  • ambiguity is not found “solely upon each party’s ability to argue a distinct interpretation of the statute”
  • if there is no clause in the policy expressly granting a privilege or imposing a duty of renewal, neither party has any right to require a renewal
  • no duty to renew property damage insurance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.