Armstrong v. Royal Lakes Associates, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that OCGA § 9-3-51 (a) did not apply to the case because it “did not involve a deficiency in the construction of an improvement to real property”
• “With respect to [appellants’] negligence claim, the statute of limitation on an action for damages to realty is four years from the date the right of action accrues.”
• “[w]e have previously rejected the contention that Mercer, which requires that an action for damage to realty be brought within four years of substantial completion, does not apply to a case in which a statute of ultimate repose is applicable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).