Armstrong v. Nationwide Mortgage Plan/Trust (In Re Armstrong)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting maximum of $17 per $100 per year to contemplate add-on calculation
• calculating a maximum of $8 per $100 per annum as add-on
• assignee was not an ECOA creditor when it was an arms-length purchaser of a loan, and there was no evidence that it knew of the ECOA violation beforehand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).