Armstrong v. Monex International Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an unserved defendant in a non-separable controversy cannot be disregarded for purposes of removal”
• holding that “an unserved defendant in a non-separable controversy cannot be disregarded for purposes of removal”
• holding that “an unserved defendant in a non-separable controversy cannot be disregarded for purposes of removal.”
• “[A]n unserved resident defendant in a non- separable controversy cannot be disregarded for purposes of removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).