Skip to main content
· 5/19/1992

Armstrong v. Meyers

Citations

  • 964 F.2d 948
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4291
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 6750
  • 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2392
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that grievance procedures established in a collective bargaining agreement may satisfy due process
  • explaining that a public employer may meet its due process obligations by providing a collective bargaining agreement that contains grievance procedures and explaining requirements for due process
  • finding that 21 a three-step grievance and arbitration procedure provided plaintiff with due process
  • finding that a CBA grievance and arbitration process satisfied procedural due process even when “only the union could take [an employee’s] grievance to arbitration, and the union refused to do so”
  • observing that post-deprivation arbitration satisfied due process
  • “The Regents, a corporation created by the California constitution, is an arm of 16 the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes, and therefore is not a “person” within the meaning of 17 section 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.