Armstrong v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of a complaint claiming breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA because ERISA did not permit the court to award the remedy the plaintiffs sought
• affirming a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of a complaint claiming breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA because ERISA did not permit the court to award the remedy the plaintiffs sought
• Mertens \compels the conclusion that plaintiffs are precluded from recovering damages for the federal and state tax liabilities they incurred on ... lump sum payments\
• reimbursement for taxes on lump-sum distribution is not equitable, though couched as \make whole\ relief
• argument that reimbursement of taxes paid in lump-sum payments could be benefits under ERISA waived when made for the first time on appeal.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).