Armstrong v. Gordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court’s exclusion of certain evidence was erroneous and inconsistent with substantial justice as it directly implicated the heart of the matter before the trier of fact
• holding that a logical nexus between the injury sued upon and an unre lated prior condition satisfied the Rondi-nelli test requiring only the possibility that the plaintiffs claimed damages in whole or in part resulted from a condition or event unrelated to the defendant’s negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).