Armstrong v. Geithner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Bartel exception did not apply where the alleged disclosure did not relate to information maintained in a system of records
• stating that a court is not required to “address an argument raised only cursorily in a footnote”
• stating that a court is not required to “address an argument raised only cursorily in a footnote”
• disclosure of information contained in record within agency’s system of records not prohibited where retrieval occurred before record became part of agency’s system of records
• a court is not required to “address an argument raised only cursorily in a footnote.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).