Armstrong v. Federal Aviation Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he issue presented—whether it was arbitrary and capricious for the Administrator to make an emergency determination under the specific factual circumstances of this case—will never arise again.”
• “[T]he issue presented—whether it was arbitrary and capricious for the Administrator to make an emergency determination under the specific factual circumstances of this case—will never arise again.”
• challenge to FAA’s emergency determination was mooted because “the issue presented – whether it was arbitrary and capricious for the Administrator to make an emergency determination under the specific factual circumstances of this case – will never arise again”
• collecting consistent cases across circuits
• collecting consistent cases across circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).